The Union Between Kabbalah And Quantum Physics
In the News (from www.scirp.org): The following article, published by the Journal of Modern Physics and co-authored by Professor I. Orion, a quantum physicisist, is a result of my collaboration with scientists from various fields. The ideas of Kabbalah are gradually becoming clear to scientists.
The Double-Slit Experiment and Particle-Wave Duality: Toward a Novel Quantum Interpretation
Itzhak Orion, Michael Laitman
Abstract | Reference Full Paper: PDF (Size:37K), pp.90–92
Particle-Wave Duality; Interference; Quantum Theory; Electrons Diffraction
The double-slit experiment demonstrates the quantum physics particle-wave duality problem. Over the last decades many interpretations were introduced to the quantum theory perception problem. In most cases there was use of unclear terms or obscure processes in these interpretations, such as particle splitting. In this paper we propose a novel concept to explain the experiment based on two postulates: The Equivalence of Form (EoF), and the particles connection to other particles, effectively functioning as a group.These two conditions are necessary to maintain wave qualities in the collective relations, and therefore cannot exist in a single particle. De Broglie introduced the mathematical relation of particle to wave; however, he did not specify the conditions for that. The proposed interpretation is a new way of looking at particles as a united group, the Kevutsa, which has a higher order level of matter. A series of identical particles maintain additional qualities to show a large united, correlated motion that we observe as waves transport through systems.
Laitman.com Post: A Look At Yourself From Above
Physical and Spiritual Connections (3:52)
“Most of the fundamental ideas of science are essentially simple, and may, as a rule, be expressed in a language comprehensible to everyone.”
― Albert Einstein, The Evolution of Physics
The two slit interference result is obtained for photons, electrons and other particles even in the limit that the flux of such particles is so low that only one particle could go through the apparatus before the next particle enters the apparatus. This means your idea that the particles are connected, and that the interference behavior cannot be ascribed to a single particle, is wrong.